Back to Top
Skip to Site Search Skip to Utility Nav Skip to Top Nav Skip to Left Nav Skip to Content
Close Main Menu

4 Faculty Research

  • 4.1 Intellectual Properties

    The purpose of this policy is to define the respective rights of creators and of the university in intellectual property ("IP"). The University of North Georgia (UNG) recognizes the significance of teaching and the supporting character of the scholarship and other IP created by its faculty, staff, and students in the course of their regular work. Universities should be places where innovation and creativity can flourish. To encourage such work, and in recognition of the efforts of its constituent members, the university distinguishes between IP created in the normal course of work and IP created under a specific contractual arrangement. Creators shall hold exclusive rights to IP created in the normal course of work-products of learning activities, exercising regular staff duties, teaching, writing, publishing and performing, etc. If the university and a faculty member, staff member, or student enter into an agreement about "assigned work," specific rules about the ownership, the commercial use, and the distribution of revenues will apply (see below).

    For definitions, refer to Board of Regents’ policy (6.3 Intellectual Properties - Board of Regents Policy Manual).  For the purposes of UNG, textbooks have the same status with respect to the creator's IP rights as other published material. 

    Instructions for Registering Intent to Create Intellectual Property
    When a member of the university community (student, staff, faculty) plans to develop IP and seeks to make special arrangements with the university or with outside funding organizations in order to develop intellectual property, the person must begin by contacting UNG's Office of Grants and Contracts Administration (GCA).

    The GCA will then begin discussions on the best way to achieve the intended results. Furthermore, the office will be responsible for maintaining a file of agreements, disclosures, revenue-sharing documents and all other paperwork related to the production of IP. The staff of the GCA will direct the potential creator to other offices on campus as may be required; e.g., the VP for business and finance, HR, the provost, or other applicable entities.

    Determining Ownership of Intellectual Property
    Definitions for purposes of this statement:
    The “creator” of Intellectual Property (IP) shall be determined to be the person or institution that has or shares a primary interest in the creation of the IP in question.   A creator refers to the person and/or institution that conceives, develops, perfects, or otherwise makes a substantial contribution to the creation of IP.  A creator of any IP owns that IP (or a percentage of that IP in the case of co-creators).

    The university may share in the proceeds of IP and be considered a creator or co-creator only under circumstances wherein the institution has actively and intentionally agreed to provide (and resulting from said agreement actually does provide) extraordinary and substantial support specifically for the creation of said IP. Additionally, such extraordinary and substantial support must be actively and intentionally accepted by the primary “creator.” A written agreement is required to indicate the university's interest in all such cases. 

    To qualify as “extraordinary and substantial university support” the university's participation in or support of the creative or developmental activity leading to IP must be active and intentional, material, significant, and beyond the resources normally provided to individual faculty, employees, staff members, and students.

    The provision of normal and customary compensation, student financial aid, library resources, office or laboratory supplies and facilities, office staff or laboratory support, telecommunications facilities at routine levels, individual personal computers, and ordinary and reasonable access to the university's computer network and websites (or similar university-provided electronic communication tools used for non-commercial scholarly pursuits), and all other similar services, supplies, and facilities does not constitute “extraordinary and substantial university support.”

    The terms “normal” and “customary” are subject to change as technology and university operations evolve. Ordinarily, “normal” and “customary” will be defined through general published procedure, actual practice, and/or established university policy.

    Discussion and Illustrations of Extraordinary and Substantial University Support
    “Extraordinary and/or substantial support” may include such elements as awarding release time, purchasing specialized equipment, paying support staff or providing student assistants specifically to assist the creator, or otherwise entering into the creation of IP after said project has been conceived (and/or otherwise begun) and providing significant support beyond the usual day-to-day support provided for teaching and/or research.

    To qualify as having offered extraordinary and substantial support, the institution must actively desire and direct that the work be done and intentionally provide most or all of the financing, staffing, and/or material support (beyond the normal and customary levels) required for the work to end in a successful product.

    The university may be considered the plenary “creator” of IP only in the limited circumstance wherein the institution has specifically hired staff (including the faculty and/or researchers responsible for conception, development, and/or completion) with the express intention of creating, ab initio, specific IP.

    In certain instances, the university might hire an outside “creator” specifically to develop a project that was begun beyond the purview of this university. In such cases, the institution may not be considered the plenary “creator” but, at most, only a “co-creator” of the IP brought in under such a hire. However, there must be a clearly defined understanding (in writing created before said hire is made) that the staff, faculty, and/or researcher specifically agrees to share IP proceeds with the institution.

    In the limited instances where the institution is deemed a “co-creator,” the "UNG Intellectual Property Revenue Distribution Guidelines" shall apply to indicate what percentage split between creator(s), department(s), and institution(s) should exist. The percentage split determined in these guidelines may be modified at any time by mutual consent of all parties involved under the provisions of this statement.

    The cases numbered I through VIII constitute possible scenarios of extraordinary and substantial support.

    I. The university actively and intentionally provides use of university software designers, programmers or other information technology staff or university computing or telecommunications facilities specifically for the creator's use in developing the agreed-upon IP, and these services and/or facilities are substantially above and beyond the services and facilities provided to other members of the institution.

    II. In the case of students, the university actively and intentionally provides support beyond ordinary and reasonable classroom/laboratory resources provided in conjunction with a specific academic program.

    III. In the case of any instructional materials, curricula, examinations, teaching or learning aids, “lessonware,” “courseware” or other student interactive audio/visual material created or used by any faculty, employee, staff member or student, extraordinary and substantial support would mean such materials:

    • are created under the active and intentional direction of the university and
    • are part of a university-initiated strategic plan for remote or distance education or cyber teaching program, and
    • have been substantially supported by the university, beyond the usual day-to-day support provided for teaching and/or research.

    IV. The university owns special or rare holdings such as museum collections, rare manuscripts or books or the like that constitute a substantial portion of the IP in question.

    V. The creator of IP makes use of university-provided student assistance substantially beyond that which is normal and customary for the department or division in question.

    VI. The creator of IP uses substantial creative or developmental contributions from university faculty, employees, staff members, or students while those persons are engaged in the course of their regular university employment or academic program (excluding the creator(s)'s own contributions).

    VII. The IP in question substantially uses voice(s) or image(s) of persons in their roles as university faculty, employees and/or staff members or substantially uses of university property in such a manner as otherwise to infringe upon university copyright, patent, trademark, or other such rights.

    VIII. The use in IP of the university's name or insignia, or the name or insignia of any of its affiliate organizations (other than for the purpose of identification of places and/or individuals) to promote any product, services or enterprise, or any other identification or reference in the IP that could reasonably be understood by members of the public to imply approval or endorsement by the university or any of its affiliate organizations.

    In a first case, where an employee works both in the office and at home developing an Internet database or writing a novel, or other such enterprise, that employee is not being given the degree of institutional support required for the university to assert any interest in the resultant IP despite the employee's use of the office computer, computer services, telephone, copy machine, paper, and all other services and materials available to said employee in the normal and customary course of the day.

    In a second case, where an employee is substantially employed to develop software solutions, or other such enterprise, that employee is being directed and supported to some degree to produce potentially valuable inventions. That degree would need to be determined, either by institutional guidelines or a mutually agreed percentage split, and the resultant profit split should flow accordingly.

    In a third case, where UNG hires a person or persons specifically to develop a new type of insect-resistant plant, or other such enterprise, and then provides all financing, space, and special equipment to cause the invention to occur, then the institution has greater (but probably not exclusive) rights to the profits resulting therefrom. Even in such a case as this, the conception, development, and successful completion of the project should earn the primary individual involved some agreed-upon share of the resultant profits flowing from said IP.

    UNG Intellectual Properties Committee
    An Intellectual Properties Committee (IPC) will be appointed by the university president in accordance with BOR policy (6.3 Intellectual Properties - Board of Regents Policy Manual). The committee's composition and duties are included in the Faculty Senate's bylaws. The committee acts in an advisory function to the president.

    UNG Intellectual Property Revenue Distribution Guidelines
    Allocations are calculated for each innovation/creation and are not affected by changes in the licensee(s) for any particular innovation/creation.  The decision to license multiple, related innovations/creations as if they were one innovation/creation will be made by the IPC in consultation with the creators of the works. If there are multiple developers/creators and more than one innovation/creation covered by a single license agreement, the majority of the developers/creators will determine the weight that each innovation/creation should be given in order to calculate the developer's/creator's share. The results of this calculation will also be used to distribute the other shares. A net accumulation will be calculated for each innovation/creation but accumulation limits (see below) apply to the multiple, related innovations/creations as if they were one innovation/creation.  Decisions about whether licenses shall be exclusive or non-exclusive shall be made by the IPC in consultation with the creator(s).

    The university's administration may reallocate central university funds and must approve any exceptions to the policy. The IPC will resolve disagreements about matters of definition and the applicability of distribution policy.

    Unless the university and the creator have come to a prior written agreement the following distribution model shall apply. Expenditures for continuing development may be subject to limitations imposed by external entities with whose support these ideas were conceived.

    Distribution of revenue from Intellectual Property substantially supported by the university

    Net income is defined as the gross monetary payments the university receives as a

    Result of transferring rights in the intellectual property less the university’s expenses (including legal fees) directly related to protecting, developing, and transferring that intellectual property.  The university’s administration reserves the right to deduct additional sums for extraordinary expenses.  After deductions the distribution of net income will be as follows:

     Revenue Distribution for University-Supported Intellectual Property Net Income


    Net income up to $25,000

    Net income above $25,000




    Creator's Research and Innovation Account



    Department’s Research and Innovation Account



    College’s Research and Innovation Account



    University’s Research and Innovation Account



    The following examples are given as illustrations of representative dollar amounts for intellectual property at varying levels of net income.

    Example for IP generating $100,000 in net income:


    First $25,000

    Above $25,000






    Creator's Research and Innovation Account




    Department’s Research and Innovation Account




    College’s Research and Innovation Account




    University’s Research and Innovation Account




    Example for IP generating $200,000 in net income:


    First $25,000

    Above $25,000






    Creator's Research and Innovation Account




    Department’s Research and Innovation Account




    College’s Research and Innovation Account




    University’s Research and Innovation Account




    If new versions of intellectual property (e.g. software/new media) are significantly different from previous versions, the new versions will be considered separate innovations/creations for the purpose of determining revenue distributions.

    Accumulation limits apply and are specified below.

    Share for the Creator

    The creator can be a person or persons or a department, college or the university. Developers/creators can also be a mix of more than one of these categories.

    Developers/creators determine allocations of this share among themselves; the IPC will resolve disagreements.

    In those cases in which the developer/creator is an individual, his/her share will not be altered when affiliation with the university is terminated. In the event of his/her death, his/her share shall inure to his/her estate.

    Share for the Creator's Research and Innovation Account

    The developer's research and innovation account can be controlled by a person or persons or by a department, college or the university. The account can also involve a mix of more than one of these categories.

    The developer's research and innovation account may be used only for university research, innovation, or educational purposes designated by the developers/creators.

    Any amount in excess of $500,000 received in a given year reverts to a strategic initiative fund maintained by the university and used for internal funding of research, teaching, and innovation projects.

    In those cases in which the creator is a person whose affiliation with the university is terminated, the creator's research and innovation account will be transferred to the university. For these purposes, emeritus status is considered as continuing affiliation with the university.

    If there is more than one creator, the same allocation percentages that govern the creator's share will be used for internal allocations of the creator's research and innovation account. Graduate students with no innovative areas of their own will not receive a portion of the creator's research and innovation account.

    If there is more than one creator and one of them leaves, the creator's research and innovation account will be reallocated among the remaining creators. New allocation percentages are based upon original ratios. For example, if the original ratio was 50/25/25 and a creator with 25% leaves, the new ratio will be 67/33. If all creators leave, the creator's research and innovation account share reverts to the university to be reallocated.

    Share for the Department's Research and Innovation Account

    The department share may be used only for university research, innovation, or educational purposes designated by the department.  Any amount in excess of $1,000,000 received in a given year reverts to a strategic initiative fund maintained by the university and used for internal funding of research, teaching, and innovation projects.

    If a creator belongs to more than one department, the unit(s) within which the innovation/creation arose receives the department share. Allocations among departments are determined by the departments according to the contribution each department made to the development of the innovation/creation; the IPC will resolve disagreements. If the creation involves several creators from different departments, allocation of the department share will follow the allocation ratio used for the creator's share. The department share is unaffected when a creator's affiliation with the university is terminated.

    Share for the College's Research and Innovation Account

    The college share may be used only for university research, innovation, or educational purposes designated by the dean of the college.  Any amount in excess of $5,000,000 received in a given year reverts to a strategic initiative fund maintained by the university and used for internal funding of research, teaching, and innovation projects. If the creation involves several creators from different colleges, allocation of the college share will follow the allocation ratio used for the creator's share.

    The college share is unaffected when a creator's affiliation with the university is terminated.

    Appeals Process
    Disputes regarding the application of this policy may be appealed, in writing, to the provost.  All appeals will be referred by the provost to the Intellectual Property Committee, which will make a recommendation to the provost within thirty (30) business days or less of its receipt of the appeal. The provost will then make a final decision, which shall be made no later than forty-five (45) business days of the provost’s receipt of the appeal. If an individual wishes to appeal the decision of the provost, or if a decision is not made within the time specified above, the individual may appeal to the president, in writing, within forty-five (45) business days of the provost’s decision. The president shall make a decision no later than forty-five (45) business days of the president’s receipt of the appeal. If the individual wishes to appeal the decision of the president, or if the decision is not made within the specified time period, then the individual may appeal to the Board of Regents in accordance with Article VIII of the Bylaws of the Board.

    Additional Resources:

    UNG Intellectual Property Disclosure Agreement

    AAUP “Statement on Copyright

    AAUP “Sample Intellectual Property Policy & Contract Language

    Intellectual Property Committee
    Purpose: The Intellectual Property (IP) Committee shall recommend to the president or his or her designee the rights and equities in intellectual property created by faculty, staff, or students of the institution. The committee will also provide oversight for appeals within the institution in the event of a disagreement as to the ownership and use of such materials.

    Composition: The committee shall be composed of the following members:

    A. Chair - The Chair of the Intellectual Property Committee shall be a faculty member appointed by the president from the following list.

    B. Administration members:

    Representative from Office of Business and Finance

    C. Faculty members:

    Five (5) faculty members, one from each college, appointed by the Leadership and Appointments Committee.

    Members shall serve staggered two-year terms.

    D. The committee may also appoint up to three (3) additional members who have expertise in the field of IP.

    Duties: The Intellectual Property Committee is a university-wide committee whose purpose shall be to advise the president or his/her designee on matters related to intellectual property policy and its application. The committee shall review disputes regarding the application of intellectual property policies and make recommendations to the provost for resolution. The committee shall also serve as a forum for the receipt and discussion of proposals to change existing institutional intellectual property policy and/or to provide recommendations for contract negotiations. The committee shall monitor changes to the BOR policy on IP

    (Pending Approval by Academic Affairs Committee, July 2013)

  • 4.2 Copyright
    The University of North Georgia complies with USG Board of Regents Policy regarding the copyrights.

    BOR Policy Manual Copyrighted Materials

  • 4.3 Human Subjects [+]
    • 4.3.1 Human Subjects Guidelines

      The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of North Georgia is responsible for reviewing and approving all research involving human participants, including faculty and staff projects, theses, and all student projects. The main function of IRB is to protect human subjects and ensure, to the best of its ability, that all research with human participants is conducted in accordance with certain ethical principles.

      For more details, visit the IRB website and the IRB FAQs.

    • 4.3.2 Institutional Review Board


      It is the purpose of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of North Georgia to assess the ethical aspects of human subjects research proposed by its students, faculty, and staff.  More specifically, the IRB ensures that the benefits of the research outweigh the risks to the participants in that research, that the participants are in no way deceived during the research process, and that participants indicate their informed consent to such research by signing (and/or having a parent or legal guardian sign) a suitable consent form.

      Composition of the Committee:
      The IRB is composed of members representing each of the academic colleges at the University of North Georgia. These core positions are held by individuals who are "actively involved" in human subjects research. A member's active involvement is defined as having published in at least one refereed journal and/or having given two conference presentations based on human subjects research in the five years immediately preceding his or her membership on the IRB. Recommendations for membership are submitted to the associate provost for administrative services for approval.

      Each school shall be represented by 3 members, each rotating terms for 3 years with staggering membership (adding one new member each year with another member rolling off to increase membership opportunities and well-rounded representation).

      At least one additional member must be from a discipline not typically involved in human subjects research (e.g. fine arts, literature, mathematics, physics, etc.). At least one member of the board must be from the local community, preferably in a public position (e.g. pastor, city council member, etc.). These members as well as additional members may be appointed by the IRB Chair.

      IRB Committee Chair:
      The IRB chair must have served at least three years as a core member. The leadership of the IRB committee shall consist of a chair-elect, chair, and past-chair. The faculty member shall serve in each position for one year for a total of 3 years in a leadership position. Qualified members interested in serving in a leadership position shall contact the associate provost for administrative services who will then appoint the chair-elect.

      Chair-Elect shall serve for a period of one year in order to prepare to take over as the chair.

      The chair shall serve for a period of one year. The chair shall review all applications for exempt, expedited, and full-committee status, maintain all files and archival of applications and all other administrative duties as required. The chair shall be the contact for all research studies involving human subjects and serves as a consultant to faculty and administrators.

      The past-chair shall serve for a period of one year and serve as a consultant to the chair and chair-Elect. The past-chair shall maintain OHRP registration in addition to Federal wide Assurance (FWA) and other memberships that are necessary for faculty to develop research agendas.

      Approved 12-DEC-2012

      For a list of current committee member visit the contact information web page on the IRB website

  • 4.4 Grants and Sponsored Projects

    It is the policy of the university to collect full Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs associated with an external grant or contract. These indirect costs are absorbed by the university to support the implementation of a sponsored project.

    Indirect Cost Allocation Policy
    University of North Georgia

    The University of North Georgia encourages grant writing that promotes the mission and goals of the university, and adequately funds facility, administrative, and other costs associated with grant activities. Moreover, UNG understands that faculty pursuit of grants is incentivized by appropriate compensation to the Principal Investigator (PI) and the home academic unit.  Accordingly, the institution seeks to encourage grant writing by allocating indirect funds in a manner that rewards faculty effort, innovation and expertise, while ensuring that general institutional expenditures associated with grant activities are funded appropriately.

    Definitions and Examples

    Direct costs are costs that can be specifically identified and assigned with relative ease and with a high degree of accuracy to sponsored projects. However, there are other costs associated with sponsored projects that are not so easily identified or assigned to the specific project.

    In order to qualify as direct costs and be included in the budget for a project, the costs must be:

    • Reasonable and necessary for the performance of the project
    • Allowable – Costs that are specifically allowed under the terms and conditions of federally sponsored projects and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-21
    • Allocable and easily identifiable – The costs must have a direct benefit and be directly attributable to the project or activity being performed

    These indirect or facilities and administrative (F&A) costs are general institutional expenditures that are incurred for multiple or shared projects, functions or activities and therefore cannot be identified with relative ease and with a high degree of accuracy to a specific sponsored project, instructional account, or any other institutional account.

    Costs incurred for multiple projects/activities must be identified as follows:

    If the cost is specific and benefits more than one project, the cost can only be assigned and allocated to the project(s) based on the portion of the expense that represents the direct benefit to the project

    This allocation of costs should be made at the time of purchase

    • If an appropriate basis, such as actual usage, cannot be identified to allocate the costs with relative ease and with a high degree of accuracy, such costs must be considered indirect costs
    • Generally, if these costs benefit multiple (e.g., four or five) projects or activities, the ability to accurately allocate the cost to the appropriate projects/activities diminishes and therefore becomes questionable as a direct cost.
    • If the benefit is spread over multiple projects to serve common shared activities and it is difficult to identify a direct benefit to each activity or project, the cost must be considered an indirect cost.

    Indirect costs are incurred in the following areas:

    Depreciation, maintenance, and utilities for university buildings and equipment

    • Academic colleges and departments for the administrative effort of clerical, faculty and other professional personnel involved in various missions of the unit
    • Expenses for offices serving the entire university, such as the President’s Office, Human Resources, Purchasing and Finance
    • Central operations, such as facilities management, telecommunications, sponsored projects administration and libraries

    The Indirect Cost Rate is a composite rate applied to sponsored projects as a percentage of the sponsored project’s direct costs. A federally negotiated indirect cost rate for organized research is developed by the University in accordance with OMB circular A-21 and negotiated with the Department of Health and Human Services, the university’s federal cognizant audit agency. This rate allows the university to recover some of the indirect costs of performing the scope of work on sponsored projects.

    Unacceptable Direct Cost Charging Practices

    The following are examples of unacceptable practices for direct charging:

    • Rotating charges among projects without establishing that the charges accurately reflect the relative benefit to each project during that specified period of time
    • Allocating indirect expenses directly to a project
    • Transferring expenses from other accounts at the end of a project period for the sole purpose of expending a residual balance

    Unallowable Costs are defined in OMB Circulars A-21 and A-110. These costs cannot be included in the development of the indirect cost rate, charged as a direct cost to federally sponsored projects, or included in university service center rates. Such costs include alumni activities, development and fund raising, entertainment and lobbying. Unallowable costs must be charged to non-federal accounts and appropriate sub-codes as defined by the university’s Business Office.


    Costs normally charged as indirect are charged as direct when:

    • There is a functional difference in the work performed by individuals in the same job classification
    • Size, nature and complexity goes well beyond normal departmental support,  e.g., center awards, epidemiology studies, clinical trials, multidisciplinary awards
    • The cost is incurred for the sole benefit of a grant, e.g., mailing a progress report to a sponsor
    • Costs listed as “indirect” can be charged directly on non-federal agreements

    Costs listed as ‘direct’ become indirect when they are for general institutional purposes or support multiple project/activities, and they cannot be charged with relative ease and a high degree of accuracy to those projects/activities.

    Typical Direct and Indirect Costs





    Salaries & Wages/Fringe Benefits

    Faculty, technicians, scientists, research assistants, postdoctoral associates, or other  programmatic personnel who are necessary to accomplish the goals of the project

    Computer Costs

      Software, supplies  and services

    Long Distance Telephone Charges

    Scientific & Technical Equipment

    Maintenance agreements related to scientific and technical equipment


      Including non-capitalized  equipment

    Participant Expenses (NSF awards)

    Lab Supplies

      Items solely consumed by the  project

    Services Obtained

      From outside vendors

    Consultant/Professional services


    Human Subjects Fees



    Salaries & Wages/Fringe Benefits

      Clerical and administrative positions such as

      fiscal officers, accountants, secretaries, directors,

      vice presidents, president, office personnel,

      executive assistants, and administrators


      Data lines, equipment, recurring, installation and



      Office and general purpose

    Janitorial Services

    Sanitation Services

      Including hazardous waste

    Repair & Maintenance

      Buildings, grounds, equipment, remodeling, etc.

    Subscriptions, Library Books, Periodicals, etc.



    Office Supplies


      For general office use


    Recruitment Travel


     Allocation Formula and Rationale

    Indirect costs must be included in all grant submissions except those grants prohibiting indirect cost reimbursement.  Indirect costs must be calculated at the university’s approved, negotiated rate unless the grant announcement sets forth a rate that must be used.  For grants that do not allow full recovery of indirect costs, but require a match, the difference between the recovery amount allowed and the university’s negotiated rate can be used as a portion of the match requirement for the grant, if allowed by the sponsor.

    Indirect costs recovered on grants will be distributed among the following in the percentages listed:


                          Principal Investigator(s)                                         30%

                          Academic Affairs                                                    30%

    Dean                                                                       20%

                          Business Office                                                      10%

                          Grants & Contracts                                                10%


    Each entity listed above will determine how funds under their purview will be used within university expenditures guidelines. Funds will be disbursed to the accounts of the entities listed above, with funds for the PI going into the PI’s department, college or unit account.  In such cases as the Principal Investigator has a joint appointment or there are multiple PI’s, possibly in different units, indirect cost distribution will be negotiated between those units prior to proposal submission as reflected on the Indirect Cost Distribution Agreement form found on the Grants and Contracts website.  Funds will be distributed quarterly on a Fiscal Year (July 1-June 30) basis with funds becoming available after they have been recovered from the sponsor.  Distribution may be delayed due to reporting requirements and schedules of grantor agencies. Principal Investigators who do not meet grant obligations successfully and in a timely manner will not receive any portion of the indirect cost distribution. 

    Other Considerations (Waivers)

    In order to facilitate service to smaller community agencies and opportunities for students to be involved in paid internships and other forms of service learning, the university will waive indirect cost recovery for grants and contracts totaling $5,000 or less. For sponsored projects over $5,000, waivers may be requested and will be considered by stakeholders on a case-by-case basis.

  • 4.5 Faculty-Authored Academic Textbooks

    A faculty member wishing to adopt a self-authored textbook for use in a University of North Georgia course must request a review of the text and approval by the “Textbook Review Committee” appointed by the dean in his/her college. The faculty member should send a letter of request and a copy of the textbook to the dean at least one semester prior to the proposed use of the text.

    The dean will appoint committee members to include the department head/chair of the faculty member’s academic unit, and at least one other faculty member who is familiar with the academic content of the text. In the case of a dean or department head/chair authoring the book, then the dean would establish an alternative committee structure.

    The committee will review the text and send a recommendation to the dean regarding approval to use the text in the faculty member’s class. The dean will communicate the decision to the faculty member and to the textbook review committee. Faculty may appeal the decision to the provost whose decision will be final and binding. In general, appeals will only be heard for cases involving alleged discrimination, procedural improprieties, or violations of academic freedom.

UNG follows Section 508 Standards and WCAG 2.0 for web accessibility. If you require the content on this web page in another format, please contact the ADA Coordinator.

Back to Top