Skip to Main Content Skip to Main Navigation Skip to Footer
UNG Logo
  • Info For...
    • Accepted Students
    • Current Students
    • Parents & Family
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Alumni
    • Business & Community
    • International Students
  • Quicklinks
    • Directories
    • myUNG
    • Academic Catalogs
    • Athletics
    • Banner
    • Bookstore
    • Calendars
    • Campuses & Maps
    • Continuing Education
    • D2L
    • Employment / HR
    • IT Service Desk
    • Libraries
    • UNG Foundation
  • Admissions
  • Corps of Cadets
  • Academics
  • Cost & Aid
  • Student Life
  • News & Events
  • Athletics
  • About Us

Find the most up-to-date information on the Presidential Search site.

College of Health Sciences and Professions
  • Academics
  • Initiatives & Clinics
    International Service Learning
    Interprofessional Education
    Community Counseling Clinic
    STAR Clinic
  • Faculty Research & Development
  • About
    Year in Review
    Advisory Council
    Strategic Plan
    Constitution
  • Contact
    1. UNG
    2. Academics
    3. College of Health Sciences and Professions
    4. Faculty Research

    Faculty Research Award Rubric

    Research Aims and Long-Term Objectives

    1. All aims and objectives are clearly presented and could be met.
    2. Some aims and objectives are clearly presented and could be met.
    3. Few aims and objectives are clearly presented and few could be met.

    Background

    • Good knowledge and evaluation of existing research.
    • Adequate knowledge and evaluation of existing research.
    • Less than adequate knowledge and evaluation of existing research.

    Significance and Originality

    1. Research has potential for significant impact.
    2. Research has potential for some impact.
    3. Research will have little or no impact.

    Research Design

    1. Most methods and procedures are clearly presented and appropriate.
    2. Some methods and procedures are clearly presented and appropriate.
    3. Few methods and procedures are clearly presented and appropriate.

    Personnel

    1. Good history of research.
    2. Adequate history of research.
    3. Less than adequate history of research.

    Potential for Further Outside Funding

    1. Good future potential.
    2. Adequate future potential.
    3. Poor future potential.

    Budget

    1. Well justified and appropriate.
    2. Fairly justified.
    3. Justification inappropriate.

    Suggested Budgetary Changes:

    Strengths:

    Weaknesses:

    Overall Evaluation:

    Total Score based on the NIH table below:

    Score Descriptor Additional Guidance on Strengths/Weaknesses
    1 Exceptional Exceptionally strong with essentially no weakness
    2 Outstanding Extremely strong with negligible no weakness
    3 Excellent Very strong with only some minor weakness
    4 Very Good Strong but with numerous minor weaknesses
    5 Good Strong but with at least one moderate weakness
    6 Satisfactory Some strengths but also some moderate weaknesses
    7 Fair Some strengths but with at least one major weakness
    8 Marginal A few strengths and a few major weaknesses
    9 Poor Very few strengths and numerous major weaknesses

    Minor Weakness: An easily addressable weakness that does not substantially lessen impact

    Moderate Weakness: A weakness that lessens impact

    Major Weakness: A weakness that severely limits impact

    Recommendations for Improvement:

    Use of Past Funding from CHSP (Acceptable/ Unacceptable):

    Recommendation for Funding:

    This form includes criteria used by the CHSP as well as additional criteria under Overall Evaluation. Adapted _____.

    UNG Logo
    • Contact Us
    • Request Information
    • Quick Facts
    • Campus Maps & Directions
    • Student Consumer Information
    • Campus Safety
    • Emergency Information
    • Employment/HR
    • UNG Policies & Procedures
    • UNG Alumni Association
    • UNG Foundation
    • Ethics & Compliance Hotline
    • Human Trafficking Notice
    • Equal Empl. Opportunity

    © 2023 The University System of Georgia and the University of North Georgia.

    UNG follows the section 508 Standards and WCAG 2.0 for web accessibility. If you require this content in another format, please send an email to the ADA Coordinator.

    Use of military-themed imagery does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Department of Defense.

    • Accreditation
    • Accessibility
    • Privacy Policy
    Establishing Connection...
    AskNigel